[1]刘振竚.当代中国法理学的主体性缺失及其转型研究[J].现代农业研究,2019,(1):107-108.
 Liu Zhenzhu.A study on the lack of subjectivity and its Transformation in Contemporary Chinese Jurisprudence[J].Modern Agricultural Research,2019,(1):107-108.
点击复制

当代中国法理学的主体性缺失及其转型研究
分享到:

《现代农业研究》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年1期
页码:
107-108
栏目:
推广与实践
出版日期:
2019-02-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
A study on the lack of subjectivity and its Transformation in Contemporary Chinese Jurisprudence
作者:
刘振竚
辽宁科技大学
Author(s):
Liu Zhenzhu
University of Science and Technology Liaoning
关键词:
法理学主体性缺失转型
Keywords:
jurisprudence lack of subjectivity transformation
摘要:
当前中国法理学仍然存在主体性缺失的问题,其主要变现为中国法理学缺乏对西方法 学的反思意识,对本国法制实践的研究关注还不足,使得中国法理学失去指导部门法学的能 力。本文通过对中国当代法理学主体性缺失的表现及原因分析,探讨了实现当代中国法理学主 体性的建议,旨在实现中国法理学的转型升级,建设具有中国特色的“共识性法理”。
Abstract:
At present, there is still a lack of subjectivity in Chinese jurisprudence, which is mainly real? ized by the lack of reflective consciousness of western jurisprudence in Chinese jurisprudence, and in? sufficient attention to the study of legal practice in China. It makes Chinese jurisprudence lose the abili? ty to guide the department of jurisprudence. Based on the analysis of the expression and reason of the lack of subjectivity in contemporary Chinese jurisprudence, this paper probes into the suggestions for re? alizing the subjectivity of contemporary Chinese jurisprudence, with a view to realizing the transforma? tion and upgrading of Chinese jurisprudence and constructing the "consensus jurisprudence" with Chi? nese characteristics.

参考文献/References:

[1] 钱继磊.迈向法理时代的中国法学——兼与徐爱国教授商 榷[J].法学评论,2018,36(01):26-41. [2] 张文显.法理:法理学的中心主题和法学的共同关注[J].清 华法学,2017,11(04):5-40. [3] 季卫东,舒国滢,徐爱国,等.中国需要什么样的法理学[J]. 中国法律评论,2016,(03):1-20. [4] 王若磊.不曾生,何谈死?中国法理学的死亡及其生的可 能[J].济宁学院学报,2016,37(04):85-92.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-02-02